[ROVERNET - UK] 10:1 2000TC vs 9:1 2000TC

Tom Trafton v8rover at earthlink.net
Wed Nov 3 01:35:01 GMT 2004


Some years ago I had my 10:1 TC motor rebuilt by a local shop;  what I
didn't know until it was too late is that they used 9:1 pistons.  The
difference in performance was quite noticible and really frustrating.  It
simply didn't have the quickness of the old motor.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Robertson" <rover2000nut at hotmail.com>
To: <rovernet at lyris.ccdata.com>
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 10:51 AM
Subject: [ROVERNET - UK] 10:1 2000TC vs 9:1 2000TC

> I was looking for the difference between a 10:1 2000TC and a 9:1 2000TC in
> terms of performance.....Has anyone had both or read a road test on
> both...........I Know the 2200 has got more zip, which is why i'm also
> building one of those
> Bill Robertson
> _________________________________________________________________
> Take charge with a pop-up guard built on patented Microsoft® SmartScreen
> Technology
>   Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN® Premium right now and get the
> first two months FREE*.
> _______________________________________________
> rovernet mailing list
> rovernet at lyris.ccdata.com
> To unsubscribe, go to this web page, look near the bottom and follow
> http://mailman.nipltd.com/mailman/listinfo/rovernet

More information about the rovernet mailing list