R: [ROVERNET - UK] British Leyland and SD1
lingfield51 at btinternet.com
Wed Nov 28 15:46:25 GMT 2007
Agree re build quality Glenn i guess you had to be around in the UK in the 70's to get a perspective of the industrial unrest and general malaise within the what was left of the British car industry. Not apportioning blame just observing and sadly the SD1 suffered considerably. A good quality machine ruined by apathy and internal squabbling.
As you rightly say Rover were handcuffed by Jaguar into not producing anything that would jeapordise their sales (Oh if only the P6BS had been produced) and held them to (psychological) ransome by buying Pressed Steel who of course produced P6 bodies.
Still it's all come full circle as Rover may be dead but at least went down fighting, Jaguar are almost dead (don't think it will be long as even Ford can't sustain their losses much longer) but thats as a result of indifference for their product on the part of the buying public........ the ultimate insult?
Alan Francis (partviking)
----- Original Message ----
From: Glen Wilson <rovercar at comcast.net>
To: rovernet at lyris.ccdata.com
Sent: Wednesday, 28 November, 2007 2:58:36 PM
Subject: Re: R: [ROVERNET - UK] British Leyland and SD1
> This show is well known in the UK but it is important not to take it to seriously. It is designed to entertain as well as inform and the presenters (one in particular) are quite outspoken and opinionated.
> Just take it for what it is quite amusing but not really taken seriously.
> Alan Francis (partviking)
Alan is ABSOLUTELY correct in his review of Top Gear. Somehow, the
absolute craziness of what they do causes me to enjoy the show and keep
liking the presenters in spite of all the sarcasm.
I hadn't seen all four videos when I forwarded them to the Rovernet, and
I might not have done so if I had realized how hard they were going to
be on the SD1.
Gianluca, the SD1 may be less sophisticated that the P6 on PAPER, but I
can assure you that the handling was excellent, especially for such a
large vehicle. It was simpler in design due to budget constraints, but
it really worked on the road. One review said that the SD1 handled like
an MGB, and I thought that was a pretty good comparison. To me, the
steering didn't have much road feel, but it was still quick and
accurate. My SD1 felt like a much smaller car on twisty roads, even with
elevation changes. Changes in direction were handled very smoothly, and
the car just seemed to stick to the road. I have only had one experience
running an SD1 against a P6, and the SD1 simply disappeared from the P6
in fast corners like approach ramps to interstate highways.
Perhaps the SD1 simply had much better tires on it, but it just seemed
to really stick to the road.
My only criticism of the SD1 is that the build quality of the few cars
we got in the USA in 1980-81 was terrible. Far behind the P6 or earlier
Rovers in this respect. My SD1 had about half an inch of open space
between the back edge of the front door and the center pillar, and that
was manufactured in. The exterior paint and the materials used in the
interior simply didn't hold up. And the SD1 was a very expensive
automobile when sold in the USA. We never got the later cars over here.
All things considered, I think that Rover did an amazing job on the SD1
considering the budgetary and design constraints they were working under.
rovernet mailing list
rovernet at lyris.ccdata.com
To unsubscribe, go to this web page, look near the bottom and follow instructions:
Back-up list and photos at:
More information about the rovernet