[ROVERNET - UK] People who buy Rovers
rovercar at comcast.net
Sun Apr 6 22:12:27 BST 2008
ilcommodor at aol.com wrote:
> i remember precisely, because my parents wanted a rover 2000tc in fall
> 1966, but settled for a 1967 122S volvo wagon, which cost a not
> inconsiderable $2800, with optional, dealer-installed rear seat belts.
> (hello? safety anyone?) the TC, at $4200, was precisely 50% more
> jamie kitman
So, there you had the option of buying a wagon and still got a great car
for a lot less money? Why was the TC so much more expensive? Was it all
that advanced engineering or the leather seats? Was the P6 considered to
be that much more upmarket? They always mention the Triumph 2000 as its
competitor. The PV544 was within an inch of the same wheelbase and
overall length as the P6, so the 122S must have been about the same size.
More information about the rovernet