[ROVERNET - UK] Who is Mercedes kidding?

Paul Smith Paul.Smith at auroraenergy.com.au
Tue Mar 1 00:46:16 GMT 2005

Same engine as a 95.
Landies didn't have the Weslake head.


-----Original Message-----
From: Hank and Sally Manwell [mailto:hdmanwell at alumni.bates.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, 1 March 2005 11:42 am
To: rovernet at lyris.ccdata.com
Subject: Re: [ROVERNET - UK] Who is Mercedes kidding?

Can't help but come to the defense of the Land Rover's ride.  We used 
both a long and short NADA version all through the 70s in the two mile 
high mountains of Colorado mostly either "off road" or on heavily 
traveled "wash board" clay roads.  The competition then was Ford Bronco, 
JEEP Scout, CJ Jeeps, Nissan Patrol.   The Land Rover handled better 
than any of them (after installing radials) while having a comparatively 
luxurious and controlled ride.   True, the long one was prone to brake 
spring leafs and axles; at least it could be driven home on a broken 
axle thanks to "full floating" bearings.   CJ JEEPS were the hardest to 
ride in followed by Bronco and Scout.  Range Rovers were just coming on 
the scene during the 70s and I don't remember any of them getting to 
Central Colorado.

I've kept the '67 109 Safari six cylinder - same engine as our '64 110 
sedan -; it has the luxury of an adjustable driver's seat.



rovernet mailing list
rovernet at lyris.ccdata.com
To unsubscribe, go to this web page, look near the bottom and follow

More information about the rovernet mailing list