[ROVERNET - UK] RE: Rover news
defender110 at ozemail.com.au
Sat Jul 1 00:30:30 BST 2006
Better and more on topic than buses and coracles.
(SEND pressed intentionally ;-)
Kent Kinard wrote:
> So Glen,
> What is a "real" Rover? Is a Jensen not a Jensen when it has an engine
> from Austin, or Chrysler or Lotus?
> Is a Marcos not a Marcos if it has a Ford, or Volvo or Rover engine? Is
> a Morgan not a Morgan if it has a Triumph or BMW engine?
> Is a Rover not a Rover if it has a Honda or Buick or VM engine? Is it
> once again spring when the sap rises and Roverites debate the question
> of the ages in its latest iteration? Is a Rover a Rover if it is built
> in China? Were New Zealand and South African built Rovers any less a Rover?
> And so it begins....again....
> Kent K.
> On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 12:20:09 -0400
> Glen Wilson <glenwilson at cavtel.net> wrote:
>> On Friday 30 June 2006 12:03, Eric Russell wrote:
>>> Now would that be the old Rover 75 or the NEW Rover
>>> from "died in the wool" P6 owner with no idea about
>>> any 75
>> That would be an "old" 75 which was a REAL Rover...
>> Oh, my God! Did I click...SEND?!?!?!?!
More information about the rovernet