[ROVERNET - UK] 2000 and 3500 similarities and differences

Kent Kinard kkinard at swbell.net
Thu Dec 1 21:23:10 GMT 2005

Vern Klukas wrote:
> Hi Kent, glad to hear you're still on the mortal coil, lol, though I 
> personally had never heard the rumor.
> More on differences, though I am no great expert on P6B, preferring the 
> 4cyl cars myself. All the comments refer to Series 1 2000s and NA P6Bs 
> only, many features were made common to the entire range in the series 2 
> cars. Here in NA Series 2 cars are like hen's teeth, so my knowledge 
> there is slim.
Hi Vern,
I read in "the book" that there was more commonality on the Series 2 
cars, but upon examining my '74 2200TC, I can't find much commonality at 
all in the front end.  The rear of the base units do have more 
commonality than on the Series 1, but I am still left with the mystery 
of the 1968 2000TC (export RHD) I have which has a factory boot mounted 
battery and no provision for a front battery at all.  I assume all 
Series 2 bonnets and bonnet latches are alike. There are at least three 
different kinds of seats and somewhere in there the P6's all got 
retractable seatbelts!

Kent K.

More information about the rovernet mailing list